More Thoughts on Google Penalties »

January 5, 2008

0 - add yours »

Like many other blog owners, we offer space to advertisers. If our blog theme is related to the particular product they offer, they may want to be listed on our site. That is taking advantage of the power of the Internet.

Google, however, is concerned that web site owners will simply sell space (and a link to their web site) to anyone and everyone and I can totally understand their concern. There are countless examples of people simply wanting to “buy” a link on a popular site in hopes of getting a boost in PR. It is lame, spammy technique and has been abused for years. Google does not want a site to benefit by using techniques like this and I completely agree (although if you Google “buy links” you will see that the sites listed as sellers of links still have PR. Hmm, must be a mistake.).

Anyway, what I don’t agree with is Google’s practice of lumping together ALL sites that sell advertising space because they can’t figure out which ones are spammy and which ones are just trying to advertise related products or services legitimately. In its current form, Google is penalizing us along with blatant spammers.

The fact that we have some advertising showing on our tech blog does not change the quality of our site’s content. For example, here are a few of our more popular posts:

• What To Do if You Suspect Identity Theft
• McAfee Offers Free Rootkit Detector
• Setup a Secure Home Network
• Secure Your Wireless Router
• Small Businesses Increasingly Targeted by Hackers

Those are posts that get hundreds and hundreds of views each month. We wrote them to be of service to our readers. If we make some money because of them, great. But we wrote them because we thought they contained important, quality information. So, just because we sell some advertising, all of a sudden the content on our site is polluting Google’s index and we get our PR stripped? Are you kidding me? That does not add up to me, but, whatever. It is your Search Engine. Do what you want.

If the only penalty for selling advertising was a reduction (or complete removal) of Pagerank, fine with me. I could really care less about Google pagerank in its current format. Although a reduction in PR certainly can hurt the perceived value of advertising on a particular site, that is about all it does right now. Pagerank fails as an effective tool for determining the value of a given web site. It is broken and only seems to really matter to newbies that don’t know any better. Don’t get me wrong – Pagerank is worth something because Google says that it is and they control an almost 60% market share of Internet searches. But it certainly is not the powerful tool that it could be or maybe even used to be.

In the end, while I did not really care that our PR was stripped, selling a few ads each month is not worth the risk of having our web site removed from Google’s Index and that is exactly how Google wants us to react. Since our tech blog was manually reviewed by Google and found to be selling advertising, we had to make adjustments to avoid the risk of de-indexing; we could not just sit back and hope that Googlebot didn’t notice.

Paid Links, De-Indexing and Google »

December 29, 2007

6 - add yours »

As has been mentioned, Google recently beat down millions of sites because they sold advertising …er… I mean links. Whatever you want to call it, Google doesn’t like it. They only want advertisers to buy links from them (through Adwords) and not spend any advertising dollars with anyone else. So, under the guise of “preserving the unadulterated purity of their search index” they penalized us, along with millions of others site owners, by removing our blog’s PR thereby making us less inviting to potential advertisers.

“I’d like to see them back off the paid links war and instead work out other ways to determine if a link deserves credit, paid or not.”
Danny Sullivan
Search Engine Land

Our Tech Blog was a 5 on its way to a 6 – m’eh, good for us. Personally, I could care less about Google’s PR. So, when our PR was stripped, I barely raised an eyebrow. We made some money from selling advertising on our blog and that was more important to me than PR. And besides, before we placed a link to an advertiser, we personally examined their site to make sure it was related to the theme and content of our site. In fact, we turned down several spammy sites that were obviously just trying to buy a good link from us and we even removed one advertiser who, after we initially approved his ad, changed his link text to say “Check out my PR5 web site” – those wacky spammers. So, yay for us. We were doing our part to fight the spammers! Rest easy, Google. The Index has been defended and remains as pure as freshly fallen snow. Surely Google could see that, right?

But then I started seeing comments about Google de-indexing sites that continued to sell advertising (crap, there I go again… I meant to say “links” instead of advertising, sorry). Posts like that really caught my attention.

In addition, Google said that some sites that are selling links may indeed end up being dropped from its search engine or have penalties attached to prevent them from ranking well.

Are you kidding me? In my opinion, I think that is taking it too far – the “de-indexing” thing (more on why I think that in future posts). Google has argued that selling links (yay, I got it right that time) pollutes its index and that is why the practice is being penalized. But, we didn’t sell links; we sold ads and the ads we sold were only for other web sites directly related to the theme of our blog. These advertisers were interested in putting their ad in front of the eyes of people looking for technology related information.

So why would you penalize us for that? Surely you checked all that and did not just paint everyone with the same brush, right?

Evidently not because I still see lots of sites that display text ads from link brokers that are unrelated to the actual site at all and those sites still have PR. Translation: Google’s system for detecting sites spamming the index is not working. Get a policy in place that actually works before implementing it. And never, ever rely on other webmasters to report to you when they find evidence of a paid link because they could have ulterior motives and might just be trying to cause problems for a competitor.

To sum up, Michael Gray said it best – Hey Google, stop crying about paid links. Their current practice of penalizing and possibly de-indexing sites is worth about as much as a submarine with a screen door.